# Proxmox Host Optimizations ## โœ… Yes, Now Supported! The one-button optimizer now has **built-in Proxmox host support**. Just run it and select Mode 1! ```bash sudo ./one-button-optimizer.sh ``` --- ## ๐ŸŽฏ What Gets Optimized on Proxmox Host ### Comparison: Desktop vs Proxmox Mode | Optimization | Desktop Mode | Proxmox Mode | |--------------|-------------|--------------| | **zram** | โœ… 50% of RAM | โŒ Skipped (VMs need RAM) | | **tmpfs** | โœ… 40% of RAM (6+ mounts) | โš ๏ธ 2GB APT cache only | | **Kernel params** | `swappiness=1` (aggressive) | `swappiness=10` (balanced) | | | `dirty_ratio=3` | `dirty_ratio=10` | | **Networking** | Basic | โœ… BBR + FQ (optimized) | | **Browser/IDE** | โœ… Auto-configured | โŒ Skipped (N/A) | | **RAM Impact** | ~40-50% allocated | ~2-3% allocated | --- ## ๐Ÿš€ Proxmox-Specific Optimizations ### 1. **Kernel Parameters** (Hypervisor-Tuned) ```bash # Memory Management (balanced for VMs) vm.swappiness = 10 # Allow some swap, don't be aggressive vm.dirty_ratio = 10 # Handle VM write bursts vm.dirty_background_ratio = 5 # Start background writes earlier vm.vfs_cache_pressure = 50 # Balance cache usage vm.min_free_kbytes = 67584 # Keep RAM available # Networking (optimized for VM traffic) net.core.default_qdisc = fq # Fair Queue scheduling net.ipv4.tcp_congestion_control = bbr # Better bandwidth & latency net.core.netdev_max_backlog = 5000 net.ipv4.tcp_max_syn_backlog = 8192 net.core.rmem_max = 16777216 net.core.wmem_max = 16777216 # File System fs.file-max = 2097152 # Support many open files fs.inotify.max_user_watches = 524288 # For file monitoring # Stability kernel.panic = 10 # Auto-reboot on panic kernel.panic_on_oops = 1 ``` **Why these values?** - `swappiness=10` (not 1): Allows kernel to use swap when beneficial for cache - `dirty_ratio=10` (not 3): Handles burst writes from multiple VMs - BBR congestion control: Better throughput for VM network traffic - FQ qdisc: Fair scheduling for multiple VMs competing for bandwidth ### 2. **Minimal tmpfs** (Optional) ```bash # Only for APT package cache (2GB) /tmp/tmpfs-cache/apt โ†’ tmpfs 2GB ``` **Benefits:** - Faster `apt upgrade` operations - Minimal RAM impact (2GB vs 40GB in desktop mode) - Leaves maximum RAM for VMs ### 3. **No zram** **Desktop Mode:** Creates 50% RAM as compressed swap **Proxmox Mode:** โŒ **Skipped entirely** **Reason:** - VMs need predictable, direct RAM access - zram adds latency and unpredictability - Proxmox already manages memory efficiently ### 4. **No Desktop Applications** Skips: - Browser cache configuration - IDE configuration - NPM/Pip cache setup **Why:** Proxmox hosts typically don't run GUI apps --- ## ๐Ÿ” Comparison: Similar but Different ### What's Similar to Desktop VMs? Both desktop VMs and Proxmox hosts benefit from: โœ… **Kernel tuning** - But with different values! - Desktop: Aggressive (`swappiness=1`) - Proxmox: Balanced (`swappiness=10`) โœ… **Network optimization** - Both use BBR & FQ โœ… **File system tuning** - Open file limits, inotify ### What's Different? โŒ **RAM allocation strategy** - Desktop: Use lots of RAM for caching (you have it!) - Proxmox: Minimize host usage (VMs need it!) โŒ **Swap strategy** - Desktop: Compressed swap in RAM (zram) - Proxmox: Traditional swap or none โŒ **Cache strategy** - Desktop: Aggressive tmpfs everywhere - Proxmox: Minimal tmpfs, let VMs cache --- ## ๐Ÿ“Š Real-World Impact on Proxmox ### Before Optimization: ``` vm.swappiness = 60 # Default (too high for hypervisor) vm.dirty_ratio = 20 # Default (causes write stalls) TCP congestion = cubic # Default (suboptimal) APT operations = disk I/O # Slower updates ``` ### After Optimization (Proxmox Mode): ``` vm.swappiness = 10 # Balanced for VMs vm.dirty_ratio = 10 # Smoother writes TCP congestion = bbr # Better VM networking APT operations = RAM speed # Faster updates ``` ### Expected Improvements: - ๐Ÿ“ˆ **VM Network:** 10-30% better throughput with BBR - ๐Ÿ’พ **Host Updates:** 50-70% faster `apt upgrade` - โšก **Write Performance:** Smoother, less stalling - ๐Ÿ“Š **Memory:** 2GB vs 40GB allocation (huge difference!) --- ## ๐ŸŽฏ Decision Tree ``` Are you on Proxmox host? โ”‚ โ”œโ”€ YES: Run one-button-optimizer โ”‚ โ”‚ โ”‚ โ”œโ”€ Want to optimize HOST? โ”‚ โ”‚ โ””โ”€ Choose Mode 1 (Proxmox) โ”‚ โ”‚ โœ… Hypervisor-tuned โ”‚ โ”‚ โœ… Minimal RAM usage โ”‚ โ”‚ โœ… Network optimized โ”‚ โ”‚ โ”‚ โ””โ”€ Want to optimize desktop VM? โ”‚ โ””โ”€ SSH into VM, run there โ”‚ โœ… Full desktop optimizations โ”‚ โœ… Browser/IDE caching โ”‚ โœ… Aggressive tmpfs โ”‚ โ””โ”€ NO (regular desktop): Run one-button-optimizer โ””โ”€ Enjoy full desktop optimizations! ``` --- ## ๐Ÿ’ก Best Practices ### โœ… DO: 1. **Run in Proxmox Mode on host** - Safe, beneficial 2. **Run in Desktop Mode inside VMs** - Perfect use case 3. **Use minimal tmpfs** - 2GB APT cache is plenty 4. **Apply network optimizations** - BBR helps all VMs ### โŒ DON'T: 1. **Run Desktop Mode on Proxmox host** - Wastes VM RAM 2. **Skip network tuning** - Free performance win 3. **Ignore kernel parameters** - They really help --- ## ๐Ÿงช Testing Proxmox Optimizations ### Test Network Improvement: ```bash # Before and after comparison iperf3 -c -t 30 # Expected: 10-30% better throughput with BBR ``` ### Test APT Speed: ```bash # Clear cache first apt-get clean # Time an update time apt-get update time apt-get upgrade # With tmpfs: significantly faster ``` ### Monitor VM Performance: ```bash # Check if VMs have enough RAM free -h # Monitor VM responsiveness pveperf # Watch network stats nload ``` --- ## ๐Ÿ“– Summary **Yes, Proxmox hosts CAN be optimized**, but differently than desktops: | Aspect | Approach | |--------|----------| | RAM Strategy | **Minimize host usage, maximize for VMs** | | Swap Strategy | **No zram, traditional swap** | | Cache Strategy | **Minimal tmpfs, let VMs handle caching** | | Kernel Tuning | **Balanced, not aggressive** | | Network | **Optimized (BBR, FQ) for VM traffic** | **Result:** Better VM performance without sacrificing host resources! ๐Ÿš€