Enhance AI analysis with professional trading assistant approach

- Updated AI prompts to behave like professional proprietary desk trader - Enhanced take profit display with RSI/OBV expectations and detailed descriptions - Added timeframe risk assessment with leverage recommendations - Implemented comprehensive indicator analysis (RSI, VWAP, OBV, MACD) - Added alternatives section with tighter stops and scaled entry options - Enhanced test script output for better trade setup visualization - Improved confirmation triggers with specific technical signals - Added cross-layout consensus analysis for multi-screenshot comparison - Cost-effective analysis using gpt-4o mini (~/usr/bin/bash.006 per analysis)
2025-07-13 17:53:35 +02:00
parent 4965a3d0af
commit 94ed58f781
2 changed files with 278 additions and 56 deletions
--- a/lib/ai-analysis.ts
+++ b/lib/ai-analysis.ts
@@ -29,8 +29,18 @@ export interface AnalysisResult {
    rationale: string
  }
  takeProfits?: {
-    tp1?: { price: number; description: string }
-    tp2?: { price: number; description: string }
+    tp1?: { 
+      price: number
+      description: string
+      rsiExpectation?: string
+      obvExpectation?: string
+    }
+    tp2?: { 
+      price: number
+      description: string
+      rsiExpectation?: string
+      obvExpectation?: string
+    }
  }
  riskToReward?: string
  confirmationTrigger?: string
@@ -38,6 +48,24 @@ export interface AnalysisResult {
    rsi?: string
    vwap?: string
    obv?: string
+    macd?: string
+    crossLayoutConsensus?: string
+  }
+  layoutComparison?: {
+    aiLayout?: string
+    diyLayout?: string
+    consensus?: string
+    divergences?: string
+  }
+  timeframeRisk?: {
+    assessment?: string
+    positionSize?: string
+    leverageRecommendation?: string
+  }
+  alternatives?: {
+    tigherStopOption?: string
+    scaledEntry?: string
+    invalidationScenario?: string
  }
 }

@@ -50,9 +78,35 @@ export class AIAnalysisService {
      const imageBuffer = await fs.readFile(imagePath)
      const base64Image = imageBuffer.toString('base64')
      
-      const prompt = `You are a technical chart analysis expert. Please analyze this TradingView chart image and provide objective technical analysis data.
+      const prompt = `You are now a professional trading assistant. You behave with the precision and decisiveness of a top proprietary desk trader. No vagueness, no fluff.

-**Important**: This is for educational and research purposes only. Please analyze the technical indicators, price levels, and chart patterns visible in the image.
+**TRADING ANALYSIS REQUIREMENTS:**
+
+1. **TIMEFRAME RISK ASSESSMENT**: Based on the timeframe shown in the screenshot, adjust risk accordingly:
+   - Lower timeframes (1m-15m): Higher risk, use at least 10x leverage for scalps, smaller position sizes
+   - Higher timeframes (4H+): Lower risk, larger position sizes, swing trades
+   - 5-minute scalps require at least 10x leverage
+
+2. **BE 100% SPECIFIC** - Provide exact levels with clear rationale:
+
+   **ENTRY**: Exact price level (with ± buffer if needed)
+   - Rationale: e.g., "Rejection from 15 EMA + VWAP confluence near intraday supply"
+
+   **STOP-LOSS**: Exact level (not arbitrary)
+   - Explain WHY it's there: "Above VWAP + failed breakout zone"
+
+   **TAKE PROFITS**: 
+   - TP1: Immediate structure (previous low/high, key level)
+   - TP2: Extended target if momentum continues
+   - Mention expected RSI/OBV behavior at each TP zone
+
+3. **RISK-TO-REWARD**: Show R:R ratio with dollar amounts if possible
+
+4. **CONFIRMATION TRIGGERS**: Exact signals to wait for:
+   - Specific candle patterns, indicator crosses, volume confirmations
+   - RSI behavior: "If RSI crosses above 70 while price is under resistance → wait"
+   - VWAP: "If price retakes VWAP with bullish momentum → consider invalidation"
+   - OBV: "If OBV starts climbing while price stays flat → early exit or reconsider bias"

 Examine the chart and identify:
 - Current price action and trend direction
@@ -64,7 +118,7 @@ Examine the chart and identify:
 Provide your analysis in this exact JSON format (replace values with your analysis):

 {
-  "summary": "Objective description of what you observe in the chart",
+  "summary": "Objective technical analysis with timeframe risk assessment and specific trading setup",
  "marketSentiment": "BULLISH|BEARISH|NEUTRAL",
  "keyLevels": { 
    "support": [list of visible support price levels as numbers], 
@@ -72,26 +126,47 @@ Provide your analysis in this exact JSON format (replace values with your analys
  },
  "recommendation": "BUY|SELL|HOLD",
  "confidence": 75,
-  "reasoning": "Technical analysis reasoning based on indicators and price action",
+  "reasoning": "Specific technical analysis reasoning with exact rationale for each level",
  "entry": {
    "price": 150.50,
    "buffer": "±0.25",
-    "rationale": "Technical reasoning for entry level"
+    "rationale": "Specific technical reasoning: rejection from 15 EMA + VWAP confluence near intraday supply"
  },
  "stopLoss": {
    "price": 148.00,
-    "rationale": "Technical reasoning for stop level"
+    "rationale": "Exact reasoning: Above VWAP + failed breakout zone"
  },
  "takeProfits": {
-    "tp1": { "price": 152.00, "description": "First target reasoning" },
-    "tp2": { "price": 154.00, "description": "Second target reasoning" }
+    "tp1": { 
+      "price": 152.00, 
+      "description": "Immediate structure target with indicator expectations",
+      "rsiExpectation": "RSI should reach 60-65 zone",
+      "obvExpectation": "OBV confirming momentum"
+    },
+    "tp2": { 
+      "price": 154.00, 
+      "description": "Extended target if momentum continues",
+      "rsiExpectation": "RSI approaching 70+ overbought",
+      "obvExpectation": "OBV making new highs with price"
+    }
  },
  "riskToReward": "1:2",
-  "confirmationTrigger": "Technical signal to watch for",
+  "confirmationTrigger": "Specific signal: Bearish engulfing candle on rejection from VWAP zone with RSI under 50",
  "indicatorAnalysis": {
-    "rsi": "RSI level and interpretation",
-    "vwap": "VWAP relationship to price", 
-    "obv": "Volume analysis if visible"
+    "rsi": "Specific RSI level and precise interpretation with action triggers",
+    "vwap": "VWAP relationship to price with exact invalidation levels", 
+    "obv": "Volume analysis with specific behavioral expectations",
+    "macd": "MACD signal line crosses and momentum analysis"
+  },
+  "timeframeRisk": {
+    "assessment": "Risk level based on detected timeframe",
+    "positionSize": "Suggested position sizing based on timeframe",
+    "leverageRecommendation": "Specific leverage suggestion for the timeframe"
+  },
+  "alternatives": {
+    "tigherStopOption": "Alternative setup with tighter stop if original SL is too far",
+    "scaledEntry": "Scaled entry approach if better levels become available",
+    "invalidationScenario": "What price action would invalidate this setup completely"
  }
 }

@@ -196,35 +271,49 @@ Return only the JSON object with your technical analysis.`
        return 'Unknown Layout'
      }).join(' and ')

-      const prompt = `You are a professional technical chart analysis expert. I'm providing you with ${filenames.length} TradingView chart screenshots from different layouts: ${layoutInfo}.
+      const prompt = `You are now a professional trading assistant. You behave with the precision and decisiveness of a top proprietary desk trader. No vagueness, no fluff.

-**IMPORTANT**: Please analyze ALL screenshots together to provide comprehensive trading advice. Compare the different layouts and use ALL available information to make the most informed recommendation.
+I'm providing you with ${filenames.length} TradingView chart screenshots from different layouts: ${layoutInfo}.

-**Analysis Requirements:**
-1. Examine ALL charts for:
-   - Current price action and trend direction across all timeframes/layouts
-   - Key support and resistance levels visible in any chart
-   - Technical indicator readings (RSI, moving averages, volume, etc.)
-   - Chart patterns or formations
-   - Market structure elements
-   - Any divergences or confirmations between the layouts
+**TRADING ANALYSIS REQUIREMENTS:**

-2. **Cross-Layout Analysis**: 
-   - Compare insights from different chart layouts
-   - Look for confirmations or contradictions between views
-   - Identify which layout provides the clearest signals
+1. **TIMEFRAME RISK ASSESSMENT**: Based on the timeframe shown in the screenshots, adjust risk accordingly:
+   - Lower timeframes (1m-15m): Higher risk, use at least 10x leverage for scalps, smaller position sizes
+   - Higher timeframes (4H+): Lower risk, larger position sizes, swing trades
+   - 5-minute scalps require at least 10x leverage
+
+2. **BE 100% SPECIFIC** - Provide exact levels with clear rationale:
+
+   **ENTRY**: Exact price level (with ± buffer if needed)
+   - Rationale: e.g., "Rejection from 15 EMA + VWAP confluence near intraday supply"
+
+   **STOP-LOSS**: Exact level (not arbitrary)
+   - Explain WHY it's there: "Above VWAP + failed breakout zone"
+
+   **TAKE PROFITS**: 
+   - TP1: Immediate structure (previous low/high, key level)
+   - TP2: Extended target if momentum continues
+   - Mention expected RSI/OBV behavior at each TP zone
+
+3. **RISK-TO-REWARD**: Show R:R ratio with dollar amounts if possible
+
+4. **CONFIRMATION TRIGGERS**: Exact signals to wait for:
+   - Specific candle patterns, indicator crosses, volume confirmations
+   - RSI behavior: "If RSI crosses above 70 while price is under resistance → wait"
+   - VWAP: "If price retakes VWAP with bullish momentum → consider invalidation"
+   - OBV: "If OBV starts climbing while price stays flat → early exit or reconsider bias"
+
+5. **CROSS-LAYOUT ANALYSIS**: 
+   - Compare insights from different chart layouts for confirmations/contradictions
   - Use multiple perspectives to increase confidence
+   - Note which layout provides clearest signals

-3. **Comprehensive Trading Setup**:
-   - Provide entry, stop loss, and take profit levels
-   - Include risk-to-reward analysis
-   - Suggest confirmation triggers
-   - Rate your confidence based on multi-layout consensus
+6. **ALTERNATIVES**: If SL is far, offer tighter alternatives or scaled entries

 **Response Format** (return only valid JSON):

 {
-  "summary": "Comprehensive analysis of all charts including cross-layout insights and consensus",
+  "summary": "Comprehensive multi-layout analysis with timeframe risk assessment and cross-layout insights",
  "marketSentiment": "BULLISH|BEARISH|NEUTRAL",
  "keyLevels": { 
    "support": [array of support levels from all charts], 
@@ -232,33 +321,54 @@ Return only the JSON object with your technical analysis.`
  },
  "recommendation": "BUY|SELL|HOLD",
  "confidence": 85,
-  "reasoning": "Multi-layout technical analysis reasoning explaining how different charts confirm or contradict each other",
+  "reasoning": "Multi-layout technical analysis with specific rationale for each level and timeframe-adjusted risk assessment",
  "entry": {
    "price": 150.50,
    "buffer": "±0.25",
-    "rationale": "Entry reasoning based on multiple chart analysis"
+    "rationale": "Specific technical reasoning: rejection from 15 EMA + VWAP confluence near intraday supply"
  },
  "stopLoss": {
    "price": 148.00,
-    "rationale": "Stop loss reasoning considering all layouts"
+    "rationale": "Exact reasoning: Above VWAP + failed breakout zone"
  },
  "takeProfits": {
-    "tp1": { "price": 152.00, "description": "First target based on multi-chart analysis" },
-    "tp2": { "price": 154.00, "description": "Second target with cross-layout confirmation" }
+    "tp1": { 
+      "price": 152.00, 
+      "description": "Immediate structure target with RSI/OBV expectations",
+      "rsiExpectation": "RSI should reach 60-65 zone",
+      "obvExpectation": "OBV confirming momentum"
+    },
+    "tp2": { 
+      "price": 154.00, 
+      "description": "Extended target if momentum continues",
+      "rsiExpectation": "RSI approaching 70+ overbought",
+      "obvExpectation": "OBV making new highs with price"
+    }
  },
  "riskToReward": "1:2.5",
-  "confirmationTrigger": "Multi-layout signal confirmation to watch for",
+  "confirmationTrigger": "Specific signal: Bearish engulfing candle on rejection from VWAP zone with RSI under 50",
  "indicatorAnalysis": {
-    "rsi": "RSI analysis across layouts",
-    "vwap": "VWAP analysis from multiple views", 
-    "obv": "Volume analysis synthesis",
-    "crossLayoutConsensus": "How well different layouts agree on the signals"
+    "rsi": "Specific RSI level and precise interpretation with action triggers",
+    "vwap": "VWAP relationship to price with exact invalidation levels", 
+    "obv": "Volume analysis with specific behavioral expectations",
+    "macd": "MACD signal line crosses and momentum analysis",
+    "crossLayoutConsensus": "Detailed comparison of how different layouts confirm or contradict signals"
  },
  "layoutComparison": {
-    "aiLayout": "Insights specific to AI layout",
-    "diyLayout": "Insights specific to DIY module layout",
-    "consensus": "Areas where both layouts agree",
-    "divergences": "Areas where layouts show different signals"
+    "aiLayout": "Specific insights and edge from AI layout analysis",
+    "diyLayout": "Specific insights and edge from DIY module layout analysis", 
+    "consensus": "Exact areas where both layouts strongly agree with confidence boost",
+    "divergences": "Specific contradictions between layouts and how to resolve them"
+  },
+  "timeframeRisk": {
+    "assessment": "Risk level based on detected timeframe",
+    "positionSize": "Suggested position sizing based on timeframe",
+    "leverageRecommendation": "Specific leverage suggestion for the timeframe"
+  },
+  "alternatives": {
+    "tigherStopOption": "Alternative setup with tighter stop if original SL is too far",
+    "scaledEntry": "Scaled entry approach if better levels become available",
+    "invalidationScenario": "What price action would invalidate this setup completely"
  }
 }

--- a/test-enhanced-screenshot.js
+++ b/test-enhanced-screenshot.js
@@ -78,18 +78,129 @@ async function testDualSessionScreenshots() {
      console.log(`   📊 Market Sentiment: ${result.analysis.marketSentiment}`)
      console.log(`   📈 Recommendation: ${result.analysis.recommendation}`)
      console.log(`   🎯 Confidence: ${result.analysis.confidence}%`)
+      
+      // Trading Setup Section
      if (result.analysis.entry) {
-        console.log(`   💰 Entry: $${result.analysis.entry.price}`)
+        console.log('\n💰 TRADING SETUP:')
+        console.log(`   <20> Entry: $${result.analysis.entry.price}${result.analysis.entry.buffer ? ' ' + result.analysis.entry.buffer : ''}`)
+        if (result.analysis.entry.rationale) {
+          console.log(`      💡 ${result.analysis.entry.rationale}`)
+        }
      }
+      
+      if (result.analysis.stopLoss) {
+        console.log(`   🛑 Stop Loss: $${result.analysis.stopLoss.price}`)
+        if (result.analysis.stopLoss.rationale) {
+          console.log(`      💡 ${result.analysis.stopLoss.rationale}`)
+        }
+      }
+      
+      // Enhanced Take Profit Display
+      if (result.analysis.takeProfits) {
+        console.log('\n🎯 TAKE PROFIT TARGETS:')
+        if (result.analysis.takeProfits.tp1) {
+          const tp1 = result.analysis.takeProfits.tp1
+          console.log(`   🥉 TP1: $${tp1.price}`)
+          console.log(`      📋 ${tp1.description}`)
+          if (tp1.rsiExpectation) {
+            console.log(`      📊 RSI: ${tp1.rsiExpectation}`)
+          }
+          if (tp1.obvExpectation) {
+            console.log(`      📈 OBV: ${tp1.obvExpectation}`)
+          }
+        }
+        if (result.analysis.takeProfits.tp2) {
+          const tp2 = result.analysis.takeProfits.tp2
+          console.log(`   🥈 TP2: $${tp2.price}`)
+          console.log(`      📋 ${tp2.description}`)
+          if (tp2.rsiExpectation) {
+            console.log(`      📊 RSI: ${tp2.rsiExpectation}`)
+          }
+          if (tp2.obvExpectation) {
+            console.log(`      📈 OBV: ${tp2.obvExpectation}`)
+          }
+        }
+      }
+      
+      if (result.analysis.riskToReward) {
+        console.log(`\n⚖️  Risk/Reward: ${result.analysis.riskToReward}`)
+      }
+      
+      if (result.analysis.confirmationTrigger) {
+        console.log(`\n🔔 Confirmation Trigger: ${result.analysis.confirmationTrigger}`)
+      }
+      
+      // Timeframe Risk Assessment
+      if (result.analysis.timeframeRisk) {
+        console.log('\n⏰ TIMEFRAME RISK ASSESSMENT:')
+        if (result.analysis.timeframeRisk.assessment) {
+          console.log(`   📊 Risk Level: ${result.analysis.timeframeRisk.assessment}`)
+        }
+        if (result.analysis.timeframeRisk.positionSize) {
+          console.log(`   <20> Position Size: ${result.analysis.timeframeRisk.positionSize}`)
+        }
+        if (result.analysis.timeframeRisk.leverageRecommendation) {
+          console.log(`   🎚️  Leverage: ${result.analysis.timeframeRisk.leverageRecommendation}`)
+        }
+      }
+      
+      // Key Levels
      if (result.analysis.keyLevels) {
-        console.log(`   🔴 Resistance: ${result.analysis.keyLevels.resistance?.join(', ') || 'None'}`)
-        console.log(`   🟢 Support: ${result.analysis.keyLevels.support?.join(', ') || 'None'}`)
+        console.log('\n📊 KEY LEVELS:')
+        if (result.analysis.keyLevels.resistance?.length > 0) {
+          console.log(`   <20>🔴 Resistance: ${result.analysis.keyLevels.resistance.map(r => `$${r}`).join(', ')}`)
+        }
+        if (result.analysis.keyLevels.support?.length > 0) {
+          console.log(`   🟢 Support: ${result.analysis.keyLevels.support.map(s => `$${s}`).join(', ')}`)
+        }
      }
+      
+      // Indicator Analysis
+      if (result.analysis.indicatorAnalysis) {
+        console.log('\n📈 TECHNICAL INDICATORS:')
+        if (result.analysis.indicatorAnalysis.rsi) {
+          console.log(`   📊 RSI: ${result.analysis.indicatorAnalysis.rsi}`)
+        }
+        if (result.analysis.indicatorAnalysis.vwap) {
+          console.log(`   📈 VWAP: ${result.analysis.indicatorAnalysis.vwap}`)
+        }
+        if (result.analysis.indicatorAnalysis.obv) {
+          console.log(`   📊 OBV: ${result.analysis.indicatorAnalysis.obv}`)
+        }
+        if (result.analysis.indicatorAnalysis.macd) {
+          console.log(`   📉 MACD: ${result.analysis.indicatorAnalysis.macd}`)
+        }
+      }
+      
+      // Layout Comparison
      if (result.analysis.layoutComparison) {
-        console.log('\n🔄 Layout Comparison:')
-        console.log(`   📊 AI Layout: ${result.analysis.layoutComparison.aiLayout}`)
-        console.log(`   🔧 DIY Layout: ${result.analysis.layoutComparison.diyLayout}`)
-        console.log(`   ✅ Consensus: ${result.analysis.layoutComparison.consensus}`)
+        console.log('\n🔄 LAYOUT COMPARISON:')
+        if (result.analysis.layoutComparison.aiLayout) {
+          console.log(`   🤖 AI Layout: ${result.analysis.layoutComparison.aiLayout}`)
+        }
+        if (result.analysis.layoutComparison.diyLayout) {
+          console.log(`   🔧 DIY Layout: ${result.analysis.layoutComparison.diyLayout}`)
+        }
+        if (result.analysis.layoutComparison.consensus) {
+          console.log(`   ✅ Consensus: ${result.analysis.layoutComparison.consensus}`)
+        }
+        if (result.analysis.layoutComparison.divergences) {
+          console.log(`   ⚠️  Divergences: ${result.analysis.layoutComparison.divergences}`)
+        }
+      }
+      
+      // Alternatives
+      if (result.analysis.alternatives) {
+        console.log('\n🔄 ALTERNATIVES:')
+        if (result.analysis.alternatives.tigherStopOption) {
+          console.log(`   🎯 Tighter Stop: ${result.analysis.alternatives.tigherStopOption}`)
+        }
+        if (result.analysis.alternatives.scaledEntry) {
+          console.log(`   📊 Scaled Entry: ${result.analysis.alternatives.scaledEntry}`)
+        }
+        if (result.analysis.alternatives.invalidationScenario) {
+          console.log(`   ❌ Invalidation: ${result.analysis.alternatives.invalidationScenario}`)
+        }
      }
    } else {
      console.log('\n⚠️ No AI analysis results received')
@@ -113,7 +224,8 @@ async function testDualSessionScreenshots() {
 if (require.main === module) {
  // Add fetch for Node.js environments that don't have it built-in
  if (typeof fetch === 'undefined') {
-    global.fetch = require('node-fetch')
+    const { default: fetch } = require('node-fetch')
+    global.fetch = fetch
  }
  
  testDualSessionScreenshots()