docs: CRITICAL - Fix roadmap Phase 7.1/7.2 status + add MANDATORY update requirements
PROBLEM DISCOVERED (Nov 27, 2025): User: "whats next on our roadmap with the biggest impact?" Agent: "Phase 3 Smart Entry Timing - NOT STARTED" User: "i thought that was already implemented?" ← USER WAS RIGHT! Reality: Phase 3 = Phase 7.1 (smart-entry-timer.ts, 718 lines, DEPLOYED) ROOT CAUSE: - Roadmap said "Phase 3: NOT STARTED" - Code reality: Phase 7.1 Smart Entry Timer fully operational - Phase 7.2 Signal Quality Validation also deployed Nov 27 - Documentation completely out of sync with deployed code IMPACT: - User confusion justified (roadmap misleading) - Wasted time investigating "next feature" already deployed - Agent suggested implementing feature that exists - Phase numbering confusion (Phase 2/3/7.1/7.2 mixed) FIXES APPLIED: 1. 1MIN_DATA_ENHANCEMENTS_ROADMAP.md: - Phase 7.1: Smart Entry Timer → ✅ COMPLETE (DEPLOYED) - Added complete documentation of deployed system - Explained timeout protection (NO MISSED TRADES) - Showed ENV config (SMART_ENTRY_ENABLED=true) - Phase 7.2: Already marked complete (Nov 27) 2. .github/copilot-instructions.md: - NEW SECTION: "📋 MANDATORY: ROADMAP MAINTENANCE" - 6 iron-clad rules for roadmap updates - Update immediately after deployment (same session) - Verify roadmap accuracy BEFORE recommending features - Never suggest features based only on roadmap status - ALWAYS grep codebase to verify implementation - Checklist for roadmap updates - Before recommending "next feature" verification steps MANDATORY WORKFLOW (ALL FUTURE AGENTS): . Complete feature/phase . Update roadmap status → COMPLETE with date . Document actual impact (after data collection) . Consolidate phase numbering if inconsistencies . Commit roadmap changes SAME SESSION . VERIFY feature exists before recommending LESSON LEARNED: Roadmap documentation is CRITICAL in real money system. Wrong roadmap = wrong priorities = wasted time = lost profits. User time is valuable - outdated docs waste it. FILES CHANGED: - 1MIN_DATA_ENHANCEMENTS_ROADMAP.md (Phase 7.1 marked COMPLETE) - .github/copilot-instructions.md (MANDATORY section added) STATUS: Documentation now reflects deployed reality ✅
This commit is contained in:
68
.github/copilot-instructions.md
vendored
68
.github/copilot-instructions.md
vendored
@@ -69,6 +69,74 @@ User is building from $901 → $100,000+ with this system. Every bug costs money
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## 📋 MANDATORY: ROADMAP MAINTENANCE - NO EXCEPTIONS
|
||||
|
||||
**THIS IS A CRITICAL REQUIREMENT - NOT OPTIONAL**
|
||||
|
||||
### Why Roadmap Updates Are MANDATORY
|
||||
|
||||
User discovered critical documentation bug (Nov 27, 2025):
|
||||
- Roadmap said: "Phase 3: Smart Entry Timing - NOT STARTED"
|
||||
- Reality: Fully deployed as Phase 7.1 (718-line smart-entry-timer.ts operational)
|
||||
- User confusion: "i thought that was already implemented?" → User was RIGHT
|
||||
- **Result:** Documentation misleading, wasted time investigating "next feature" already deployed
|
||||
|
||||
### IRON-CLAD RULES for Roadmap Updates
|
||||
|
||||
**1. UPDATE ROADMAP IMMEDIATELY AFTER DEPLOYMENT**
|
||||
- ✅ Phase completed → Mark as COMPLETE with deployment date
|
||||
- ✅ Phase started → Update status to IN PROGRESS
|
||||
- ✅ Expected impact realized → Document actual data vs expected
|
||||
- ✅ Commit roadmap changes SAME SESSION as feature deployment
|
||||
|
||||
**2. VERIFY ROADMAP ACCURACY BEFORE RECOMMENDING FEATURES**
|
||||
- ❌ NEVER suggest implementing features based ONLY on roadmap status
|
||||
- ✅ ALWAYS grep codebase for existing implementation before recommending
|
||||
- ✅ Check: Does file exist? Is it integrated? Is ENV variable set?
|
||||
- ✅ Example: Phase 3 "not started" but smart-entry-timer.ts exists = roadmap WRONG
|
||||
|
||||
**3. MAINTAIN PHASE NUMBERING CONSISTENCY**
|
||||
- If code says "Phase 7.1" but roadmap says "Phase 3", consolidate naming
|
||||
- Update ALL references (roadmap files, code comments, documentation)
|
||||
- Prevent confusion from multiple names for same feature
|
||||
|
||||
**4. ROADMAP FILES TO UPDATE**
|
||||
- `1MIN_DATA_ENHANCEMENTS_ROADMAP.md` (main detailed roadmap)
|
||||
- `docs/1MIN_DATA_ENHANCEMENTS_ROADMAP.md` (documentation copy)
|
||||
- `OPTIMIZATION_MASTER_ROADMAP.md` (high-level consolidated view)
|
||||
- Website roadmap API endpoint (if applicable)
|
||||
- This file's "When Making Changes" section (if new pattern learned)
|
||||
|
||||
**5. ROADMAP UPDATE CHECKLIST**
|
||||
When completing ANY feature or phase:
|
||||
- [ ] Mark phase status: NOT STARTED → IN PROGRESS → COMPLETE
|
||||
- [ ] Add deployment date: ✅ COMPLETE (Nov 27, 2025)
|
||||
- [ ] Document actual impact vs expected (after 50-100 trades data)
|
||||
- [ ] Update phase numbering if inconsistencies exist
|
||||
- [ ] Commit with message: "docs: Update roadmap - Phase X complete"
|
||||
- [ ] Verify website roadmap updated (if applicable)
|
||||
|
||||
**6. BEFORE RECOMMENDING "NEXT FEATURE"**
|
||||
```bash
|
||||
# 1. Read roadmap to identify highest-impact "NOT STARTED" feature
|
||||
cat 1MIN_DATA_ENHANCEMENTS_ROADMAP.md | grep "NOT STARTED"
|
||||
|
||||
# 2. VERIFY it's actually not implemented (grep for files/classes)
|
||||
grep -r "SmartEntryTimer" lib/
|
||||
grep -r "SMART_ENTRY_ENABLED" .env
|
||||
|
||||
# 3. If files exist → ROADMAP WRONG, update it first
|
||||
# 4. Only then recommend truly unimplemented features
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
**WHY THIS MATTERS:**
|
||||
|
||||
User relies on roadmap for strategic planning. Wrong roadmap = wrong decisions = wasted development time = delayed profit optimization. In a real money system, time wasted = money not earned.
|
||||
|
||||
**Outdated roadmap = wasted user time = lost profits**
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## Mission & Financial Goals
|
||||
|
||||
**Primary Objective:** Build wealth systematically from $106 → $100,000+ through algorithmic trading
|
||||
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user