critical: Fix Bug 1 (revenge external closures) & Bug 5 (validated entry bypass)

Bug 1 Fix - Revenge System External Closures:
- External closure handler now checks if SL stop-out with quality 85+
- Calls stopHuntTracker.recordStopHunt() after database save
- Enables revenge trading for on-chain order fills (not just Position Manager closes)
- Added null safety for trade.signalQualityScore (defaults to 0)
- Location: lib/trading/position-manager.ts line ~999

Bug 5 Fix - Execute Endpoint Validated Entry Bypass:
- Added isValidatedEntry check before quality threshold rejection
- Smart Validation Queue signals (quality 50-89) now execute successfully
- Logs show bypass reason and validation details (delay, original quality)
- Only affects signals with validatedEntry=true flag from queue
- Location: app/api/trading/execute/route.ts line ~228

User Clarification:
- TradingView price issue (4.47) was temporary glitch, not a bug
- Only Bug 1 (revenge) and Bug 5 (execute rejection) needed fixing
- Both fixes implemented and TypeScript errors resolved

app/api/trading/execute/route.ts

@@ -225,9 +225,20 @@ export async function POST(request: NextRequest): Promise<NextResponse<ExecuteTr
     
     console.log(`✅ 5min signal confirmed - proceeding with trade execution`)
     
+    // CRITICAL FIX (Dec 3, 2025): Check for validated entry bypass BEFORE quality threshold
+    // Bug Fix: Smart Validation Queue validates quality 50-89 signals, but execute endpoint was rejecting them
+    // Solution: If validatedEntry=true flag present, bypass quality check (signal already validated by queue)
+    const isValidatedEntry = body.validatedEntry === true
+    
+    if (isValidatedEntry) {
+      console.log(`✅ VALIDATED ENTRY BYPASS: Quality ${qualityResult.score} accepted (validated by Smart Entry Queue)`)
+      console.log(`   Original quality: ${body.originalQualityScore}, Validation delay: ${body.validationDelayMinutes}min`)
+    }
+    
     // CRITICAL FIX (Nov 27, 2025): Verify quality score meets minimum threshold
     // Bug: Quality 30 trade executed because no quality check after timeframe validation
-    if (qualityResult.score < minQualityScore) {
+    // ENHANCED (Dec 3, 2025): Skip this check if validatedEntry=true (already validated by queue)
+    if (!isValidatedEntry && qualityResult.score < minQualityScore) {
       console.log(`❌ QUALITY TOO LOW: ${qualityResult.score} < ${minQualityScore} threshold for ${body.direction.toUpperCase()}`)
       console.log(`   Reasons: ${qualityResult.reasons.join(', ')}`)
       return NextResponse.json({
@@ -558,10 +569,11 @@ export async function POST(request: NextRequest): Promise<NextResponse<ExecuteTr
           direction: body.direction,
           qualityScore: qualityResult.score,
         }, { status: 200 })
-      } else if (pullbackMagnitude > pullbackMax) {
-        // Pullback too large - might be reversal, execute with caution
-        console.log(`⚠️ Smart Entry: Pullback too large (${pullbackMagnitude.toFixed(2)}% > ${pullbackMax}%)`)
-        console.log(`   Possible reversal - executing at current price with caution`)
+        } else if (pullbackMagnitude > pullbackMax) {
+          // Pullback too large - might be reversal, execute with caution
+          console.log(`⚠️ Smart Entry: Pullback too large (${pullbackMagnitude.toFixed(2)}% > ${pullbackMax}%)`)
+          console.log(`   Possible reversal - executing at current price with caution`)
+        }
       }
     }