# High Availability Setup Roadmap **Status:** 🎯 FUTURE **Priority:** Medium **Estimated Effort:** 2-3 days full implementation **Dependencies:** Stable production system, consistent profitability --- ## Current State (Nov 19, 2025) ✅ **Warm Standby Ready:** - Secondary server at `root@72.62.39.24` with rsync'd code - Can manually failover in 10-15 minutes if primary fails - Single-server operation prevents duplicate trades ❌ **Not Automated:** - Manual DNS/webhook updates required - No automatic failover detection - No reverse proxy/load balancer setup --- ## Phase 1: Warm Standby Maintenance (CURRENT) **Goal:** Keep secondary server ready for manual failover **Tasks:** - [ ] Daily rsync from primary to secondary (automated) - [ ] Weekly startup test on secondary (verify working) - [ ] Document manual failover procedure - [ ] Test database restore on secondary **Acceptance Criteria:** - Can start secondary and verify trading bot works within 5 minutes - Secondary has code/config updated within 24 hours of primary - Clear runbook for emergency failover **Timeline:** 1 day setup + ongoing maintenance --- ## Phase 2: Database Replication (NEXT) **Goal:** Zero data loss on failover **Tasks:** - [ ] Setup PostgreSQL streaming replication - [ ] Configure replication user and permissions - [ ] Test replica lag monitoring - [ ] Automate replica promotion on failover **Acceptance Criteria:** - Secondary database max 5 seconds behind primary - Trade history preserved during failover - Automatic replica promotion script tested **Timeline:** 2-3 days --- ## Phase 3: Health Monitoring & Alerts (NEXT) **Goal:** Know when primary fails, prepare for manual intervention **Tasks:** - [ ] Deploy healthcheck script on both servers - [ ] Setup monitoring dashboard (Grafana/simple webpage) - [ ] Telegram alerts for primary failures - [ ] Create failover decision flowchart **Acceptance Criteria:** - Telegram alert within 60 seconds of primary failure - Dashboard shows primary/secondary status - Clear steps for manual failover documented **Timeline:** 1-2 days --- ## Phase 4: Reverse Proxy + Floating IP (FUTURE) **Goal:** Automatic traffic routing to active server **Options:** ### Option A: Floating IP (Simplest) - Use cloud provider's floating IP (DigitalOcean, AWS EIP) - IP automatically moves between servers - Requires: Cloud infrastructure, not bare metal ### Option B: DNS-based Failover - Use DNS provider with health checks (Cloudflare, Route53) - Automatic DNS updates on failure - 1-5 minute TTL delay for propagation ### Option C: Reverse Proxy - HAProxy or nginx in front of both servers - Health checks route to active server - Requires: Third server for proxy (single point of failure) **Tasks:** - [ ] Evaluate infrastructure options (cloud vs bare metal) - [ ] Choose failover mechanism (Floating IP vs DNS vs Proxy) - [ ] Implement automatic traffic routing - [ ] Test failover scenarios (primary crash, network partition) **Acceptance Criteria:** - TradingView webhooks automatically route to active server - Failover completes within 2 minutes with zero manual intervention - No duplicate trades during failover window - n8n workflows continue without reconfiguration **Timeline:** 3-5 days (depends on option chosen) --- ## Phase 5: Automated Failover Controller (FUTURE) **Goal:** Fully autonomous HA system **Tasks:** - [ ] Deploy failover controller on secondary - [ ] Configure automatic container startup on failure detection - [ ] Implement split-brain prevention - [ ] Test recovery scenarios (primary comes back online) - [ ] Setup automatic database sync on recovery **Acceptance Criteria:** - Secondary automatically activates within 60 seconds of primary failure - Primary automatically resumes when recovered - No manual intervention required for 99% of failures - Telegram notifications for all state changes **Timeline:** 2-3 days --- ## Phase 6: Geographic Redundancy (DISTANT FUTURE) **Goal:** Multi-region deployment for global reliability **Considerations:** - Secondary in different geographic region (US vs EU) - Protects against regional outages - Lower latency for global users - Requires: More complex routing, higher costs **Timeline:** 1+ weeks --- ## Decision Gates **Proceed to Phase 2+ when:** - Trading system profitable for 3+ consecutive months - Capital > $10,000 (downtime = significant money loss) - User frequently unavailable (travel, sleep schedule, etc.) - Primary server has experienced 2+ unplanned outages **Stay in Phase 1 when:** - System still in testing/optimization phase - User can manually intervene within 30 minutes most of the time - Capital < $5,000 (manual failover acceptable) - Primary server stable (99%+ uptime) --- ## Cost-Benefit Analysis ### Current State (Warm Standby) - **Cost:** ~$10-20/month for secondary server - **Benefit:** 10-15 min manual failover vs hours of setup from scratch - **ROI:** Good - cheap insurance ### Full HA (All Phases) - **Cost:** ~$50-100/month (servers, floating IP, monitoring) - **Time:** 1-2 weeks of development - **Benefit:** 99.9% uptime, automatic failover, peace of mind - **ROI:** Only worth it when trading capital justifies the cost ### Break-Even Point - If trading $10k+ capital at 15% monthly returns = $1,500/month - 1 hour downtime = ~$2 lost opportunity - 24 hour downtime = ~$50 lost + potential missed exit = $100-500 risk - HA pays for itself after 1-2 major outages --- ## Current Recommendation (Nov 19, 2025) **Stay in Phase 1** (Warm Standby) because: - Capital still under $1,000 - System in active optimization (indicator testing, quality tuning) - User available for manual intervention most of the time - Primary server stable **Revisit in Q1 2026** when: - Capital reaches $5,000+ (Phase 2 target) - System proven profitable over 3+ months - Trading strategy stabilized (v8 indicator validated) --- ## Related Files - `/home/icke/traderv4/ha-setup/` - HA scripts (created but not deployed) - `TRADING_GOALS.md` - Financial roadmap (HA aligns with Phase 4-5) - `OPTIMIZATION_MASTER_ROADMAP.md` - System improvements (HA is infrastructure) --- ## Notes - **Manual failover is acceptable for now** - 10-15 min downtime won't cause financial loss at current scale - **Focus on profitability first** - HA is luxury when system isn't making consistent money yet - **Complexity vs benefit** - Full HA adds operational overhead that may not be worth it yet - **Revisit quarterly** - As capital grows, HA becomes more important