Created unified roadmap consolidating all three optimization initiatives to reduce fragmentation and provide single source of truth. Three parallel data-driven optimizations: 1. Signal Quality (0/20 blocked signals) - 2-3 weeks 2. Position Scaling (160 trades, need v6 data) - 3-4 weeks 3. ATR-based TP (1/50 trades) - 6-8 weeks All follow same pattern: collect data → analyze → implement → A/B test Expected combined impact: 35-40% P&L improvement over 3 months 4-5 months to reach $2,500 Includes: - Unified timeline & priorities - Progress tracking framework - Weekly/monthly check-in questions - Risk management (no premature optimization) - Cross-references to all three roadmaps Single dashboard for all optimization efforts.
11 KiB
Trading Bot Optimization - Master Roadmap
Last Updated: November 12, 2025
Current Capital: $97.55 USDC
Phase 1 Goal: $106 → $2,500 (60%+ win rate, aggressive compounding)
Overview: Three Parallel Data-Driven Optimizations
All three initiatives follow the same pattern:
- Collect data with current system (20-50 trades)
- Analyze patterns via SQL backtesting
- Implement changes with A/B testing
- Deploy if successful (10%+ improvement required)
🎯 Initiative 1: Signal Quality Optimization
File: SIGNAL_QUALITY_OPTIMIZATION_ROADMAP.md
Purpose
Filter out bad trades BEFORE entry by optimizing quality score thresholds.
Current Status
📊 Phase 1 (IN PROGRESS) - Blocked Signals Collection
- Progress: 0/10-20 blocked signals needed
- Started: November 11, 2025
- System: Automatically saves blocked signals to database with full metrics
What's Being Collected
Every blocked signal saves:
- Signal metrics: ATR, ADX, RSI, volumeRatio, pricePosition, timeframe
- Quality score + breakdown (what caused low score)
- Block reason (QUALITY_SCORE_TOO_LOW, COOLDOWN, etc.)
- Future: Price movement tracking (would it have hit TP1/TP2/SL?)
Key Questions to Answer
- Are we blocking good signals? (score 55-59 that would have won)
- Are we letting bad signals through? (score 65-70 that lose)
- Should threshold be 60? 65? 70? Symbol-specific?
Timeline
- Phase 1: 1-2 weeks (need 10-20 blocked signals)
- Phase 2: 1 day (SQL analysis)
- Phase 3: 2-3 hours (adjust thresholds)
- Total: ~2-3 weeks
Success Metrics
- Win rate improves by 5%+ (60% → 65%)
- Fewer losing trades in 50-60% drawdown range
- Maintain or increase trade frequency
SQL Queries Ready
See BLOCKED_SIGNALS_TRACKING.md for full query reference
📐 Initiative 2: Position Scaling & Exit Strategy
File: POSITION_SCALING_ROADMAP.md
Purpose
Optimize HOW MUCH to close at each target and WHEN to move stops.
Current Status
✅ Phase 5 COMPLETE - TP2-as-Runner Implemented (Nov 11)
- TP1 closes 75% (configurable via
TAKE_PROFIT_1_SIZE_PERCENT) - TP2 activates trailing stop on remaining 25%
- ATR-based dynamic trailing stop (Nov 11)
📊 Phase 2-4 PENDING - Need more trade data
- Requires 50+ trades with full MFE/MAE tracking
- Currently: 160 trades total, need more with v6 indicator data
What's Being Collected
Every trade tracks:
maxFavorableExcursion(MFE) - best profit % reachedmaxAdverseExcursion(MAE) - worst drawdown % reachedmaxFavorablePrice/maxAdversePrice- exact prices- Actual TP1/TP2/SL hit vs theoretical optimal exits
Key Questions to Answer
- Should TP1 be at 0.4% or 0.6%? (optimize via MFE data)
- Should runner be 25% or 35%? (quality-based sizing)
- When to move SL to breakeven? (after TP1 or earlier?)
- Should high-quality signals (95+) keep 35% runner vs 25%?
Timeline
- Phase 1: ✅ COMPLETE
- Phase 2: 2-3 weeks (collect 50+ trades)
- Phase 3: 1 day (SQL analysis)
- Phase 4: 2-3 hours (implement quality-based scaling)
- Total: ~3-4 weeks
Success Metrics
- 15%+ increase in total P&L
- Maintain 60%+ win rate
- Average winner size increases
- Runner exits capture extended moves
Related Systems
- ATR-based trailing stop (✅ implemented Nov 11)
- TP2-as-runner activation (✅ implemented Nov 11)
- Quality-based position sizing (🔜 after data collection)
📊 Initiative 3: ATR-Based Take Profit Levels
File: ATR_BASED_TP_ROADMAP.md
Purpose
Replace fixed % targets with volatility-adaptive targets using ATR multipliers.
Current Status
📊 Phase 1 (IN PROGRESS) - ATR Data Collection
- Progress: 1/50 trades with ATR tracking
- Started: November 11, 2025 (with indicator v6)
- System:
atrAtEntryfield saved with every trade
Current System (Fixed %)
TP1: Entry + 0.4% (always)
TP2: Entry + 0.7% (always)
SL: Entry - 1.0% (always)
Proposed System (ATR Multipliers)
TP1: Entry + (ATR × 1.5) # Adaptive target
TP2: Entry + (ATR × 2.5) # Adaptive target
SL: Entry - (ATR × 2.0) # Adaptive stop
What's Being Collected
Every trade now saves:
atrAtEntry(Float) - ATR % when trade opened- Entry price, exit price, realized P&L
- MFE/MAE to determine if ATR-based targets would have hit
Key Questions to Answer
- Does 1.5x ATR TP1 hit more often than fixed 0.4%?
- Do ATR-based targets improve P&L by 10%+?
- What multipliers work best? (1.5x? 2.0x? Symbol-specific?)
- Should we use hybrid? (max of fixed % OR ATR-based)
Example Comparison
Current trade (ATR=0.26%, entry=$160.62):
- Fixed 0.4% TP1: $161.27 (+$0.64)
- 1.5x ATR TP1: $161.25 (+$0.63) ← Almost identical!
But in volatile market (ATR=0.50%):
- Fixed 0.4% TP1: $161.27 (same)
- 1.5x ATR TP1: $161.83 (+0.75%) ← 88% wider, more room!
Timeline
- Phase 1: 2-4 weeks (collect 50+ trades with ATR)
- Phase 2: 1-2 days (backtest analysis)
- Phase 3: 2-3 hours (implementation)
- Phase 4: 2-3 weeks (A/B testing)
- Total: ~6-8 weeks
Success Metrics
- TP1 hit rate ≥ 75% (vs current ~70%)
- Win rate maintained at 60%+
- Total P&L improvement of 10%+
- Better performance in volatile vs calm markets
SQL Backtest Ready
Complete backtest query in ATR_BASED_TP_ROADMAP.md (lines 100-150)
📅 Unified Timeline & Priorities
Current Week (Nov 12-18, 2025)
Focus: Data collection for all three initiatives
- ✅ Systems deployed and collecting data automatically
- 🔄 Execute 10-15 trades (indicator v6 in production)
- 📊 Monitor: 0 blocked signals, 1 ATR-tracked trade, 160 total trades
Week 2-3 (Nov 19 - Dec 2)
Focus: Signal Quality Analysis (fastest ROI)
- Should have 10-20 blocked signals by then
- Run SQL analysis on blocked vs executed trades
- Adjust quality thresholds if data shows improvement
- Expected Impact: +5% win rate, fewer bad trades
Week 4-5 (Dec 3-16)
Focus: Continue data collection
- Target: 30-40 total trades with v6 + ATR data
- Monitor performance with any signal quality changes
- Begin preliminary ATR-based backtest analysis
Week 6-8 (Dec 17 - Jan 6)
Focus: Position Scaling & ATR-based TP Analysis
- Should have 50+ trades by then
- Run comprehensive backtests on both initiatives
- Implement changes with highest expected value
- A/B test for 2-3 weeks
Phase 1 Complete (Late January 2026)
Target: All three optimizations deployed and validated
- Signal quality: Optimized thresholds
- Position scaling: Quality-based runner sizing
- ATR-based TP: Volatility-adaptive targets (if backtest successful)
🎯 Expected Combined Impact
Conservative Estimate
If each initiative improves performance by 10% independently:
- Signal Quality: +5% win rate → fewer losses
- Position Scaling: +15% average win size → bigger winners
- ATR-based TP: +10% total P&L → better hit rates
Combined: ~35-40% improvement in total P&L over 3 months
Impact on Phase 1 Goal ($106 → $2,500)
Current trajectory: 20-30% monthly returns = 6-7 months With optimizations: 25-35% monthly returns = 4-5 months
📊 Data Requirements Summary
| Initiative | Data Needed | Current Progress | Est. Completion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Signal Quality | 10-20 blocked signals | 0/20 (0%) | ~2 weeks |
| Position Scaling | 50+ trades w/ MFE/MAE | 160/50 (✅) but need v6 data | ~3 weeks |
| ATR-based TP | 50+ trades w/ ATR | 1/50 (2%) | ~4 weeks |
Bottleneck: Trade frequency (3-5 signals/day = 10-17 days for 50 trades)
🔧 Technical Implementation Status
✅ Already Implemented (Ready for data)
atrAtEntryfield in database (Nov 11)indicatorVersiontracking (Nov 12)- ATR-based trailing stop (Nov 11)
- TP2-as-runner system (Nov 11)
- BlockedSignal table & auto-logging (Nov 11)
- MFE/MAE tracking (existing)
- Signal quality scoring v4 (Nov 11)
🔜 Needs Implementation (After data analysis)
- Quality threshold adjustments
- Quality-based position sizing
- ATR-based TP/SL calculation (optional toggle)
- Hybrid target system (max of fixed % or ATR)
📝 Configuration Ready
All systems have ENV variables and config structure ready:
MIN_SIGNAL_QUALITY_SCORE(adjustable after analysis)TAKE_PROFIT_1_SIZE_PERCENT(70% default, adjustable)USE_ATR_BASED_TARGETS(false, will enable after backtest)TP1_ATR_MULTIPLIER,TP2_ATR_MULTIPLIER,SL_ATR_MULTIPLIER
📈 Progress Tracking
Weekly Check-in Questions
- How many trades executed this week?
- How many blocked signals collected?
- Any patterns emerging in blocked signals?
- What's the current win rate vs target 60%?
- Are MFE/MAE averages improving?
Monthly Review Questions
- Do we have enough data for next optimization phase?
- What's the biggest win/loss this month and why?
- Is indicator v6 outperforming v5? (need 20+ trades each)
- Should we adjust any thresholds based on patterns?
- Are we on track for Phase 1 goal ($2,500)?
🚨 Risk Management
Don't Optimize Too Early
- ❌ Bad: Change thresholds after 5 trades and 2 blocked signals
- ✅ Good: Wait for 20 blocked signals + 50 trades minimum
- Statistical significance matters!
Keep Historical Baseline
- Always compare against "what would the old system do?"
- Track
signalQualityVersionandindicatorVersionfor this - Can revert if changes make things worse
A/B Test Before Full Deploy
- Test new thresholds on 50% of signals (coin flip)
- Compare results after 20-30 trades
- Only deploy if statistically better (p < 0.05)
📚 Related Documentation
Core System:
copilot-instructions.md- Full system architectureTRADING_GOALS.md- 8-phase financial roadmap ($106 → $1M+)ATR_TRAILING_STOP_FIX.md- Dynamic trailing stop implementation
Data Analysis:
BLOCKED_SIGNALS_TRACKING.md- SQL queries for signal analysisdocs/analysis/SIGNAL_QUALITY_VERSION_ANALYSIS.sql- Version comparison queries
Implementation Guides:
SIGNAL_QUALITY_SETUP_GUIDE.md- How signal scoring worksPERCENTAGE_SIZING_FEATURE.md- Position sizing system
🎯 Next Actions
Immediate (This Week)
- ✅ Deploy indicator v6 to TradingView production
- 🔄 Execute 10-15 trades to start data collection
- 📊 Monitor blocked signals (target: 2-3 this week)
- 🎯 Verify current trade closes correctly with new fixes
Short Term (2-3 Weeks)
- Collect 10-20 blocked signals
- Run signal quality analysis
- Adjust MIN_SIGNAL_QUALITY_SCORE if data shows improvement
- Continue collecting ATR data (target: 30-40 trades)
Medium Term (4-8 Weeks)
- Run position scaling backtest (50+ trades)
- Run ATR-based TP backtest (50+ trades)
- Implement quality-based position sizing
- A/B test ATR-based targets vs fixed %
- Deploy winning strategies
Long Term (Phase 1 Complete)
- Document all optimizations in
copilot-instructions.md - Prepare for Phase 2 ($2,500 → $10,000)
- Consider new optimizations:
- Time-of-day filtering
- Symbol-specific thresholds
- Volatility regime detection
- Machine learning for signal scoring
Bottom Line: Three complementary optimizations, all data-driven, all on track. Focus on collecting clean data now, analyze when we have enough, implement what works. No premature optimization. 📊🚀