Fix: Add timeframe-aware signal quality scoring for 5min charts
PROBLEM: - Long signal (ADX 15.7, ATR 0.35%) blocked with score 45/100 - Missed major +3% runup, lost -2 on short that didn't flip - Scoring logic treated all timeframes identically (daily chart thresholds) ROOT CAUSE: - ADX < 18 always scored -15 points regardless of timeframe - 5min charts naturally have lower ADX (12-22 healthy range) - copilot-instructions mentioned timeframe awareness but wasn't implemented FIX: - Add timeframe parameter to RiskCheckRequest interface - Update scoreSignalQuality() with timeframe-aware ADX thresholds: * 5min/15min: ADX 12-22 healthy (+5), <12 weak (-15), >22 strong (+15) * Higher TF: ADX 18-25 healthy (+5), <18 weak (-15), >25 strong (+15) - Pass timeframe from n8n workflow through check-risk and execute - Update both Check Risk nodes in Money Machine workflow IMPACT: Your blocked signal (ADX 15.7 on 5min) now scores: - Was: 50 + 5 - 15 + 0 + 0 + 5 = 45 (BLOCKED) - Now: 50 + 5 + 5 + 0 + 0 + 5 = 65 (PASSES) This 20-point improvement from timeframe awareness would have caught the runup.
This commit is contained in:
@@ -25,6 +25,10 @@ export interface SignalQualityResult {
|
||||
*
|
||||
* Total range: ~15-115 points (realistically 30-100)
|
||||
* Threshold: 60 points minimum for execution
|
||||
*
|
||||
* TIMEFRAME-AWARE SCORING:
|
||||
* - 5min charts have lower ADX/ATR thresholds (trends develop slower)
|
||||
* - Higher timeframes require stronger confirmation
|
||||
*/
|
||||
export function scoreSignalQuality(params: {
|
||||
atr: number
|
||||
@@ -33,11 +37,17 @@ export function scoreSignalQuality(params: {
|
||||
volumeRatio: number
|
||||
pricePosition: number
|
||||
direction: 'long' | 'short'
|
||||
timeframe?: string // "5" = 5min, "15" = 15min, "60" = 1H, "D" = daily
|
||||
minScore?: number // Configurable minimum score threshold
|
||||
}): SignalQualityResult {
|
||||
let score = 50 // Base score
|
||||
const reasons: string[] = []
|
||||
|
||||
// Determine if this is a short timeframe (5min, 15min)
|
||||
const is5minChart = params.timeframe === '5'
|
||||
const is15minChart = params.timeframe === '15'
|
||||
const isShortTimeframe = is5minChart || is15minChart
|
||||
|
||||
// ATR check (volatility gate: 0.15% - 2.5%)
|
||||
if (params.atr > 0) {
|
||||
if (params.atr < 0.15) {
|
||||
@@ -55,17 +65,34 @@ export function scoreSignalQuality(params: {
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
// ADX check (trend strength: want >18)
|
||||
// ADX check - TIMEFRAME AWARE (trend strength)
|
||||
// 5min/15min: 12-22 is healthy (trends develop slower)
|
||||
// 1H+: 18+ is healthy (stronger trends expected)
|
||||
if (params.adx > 0) {
|
||||
if (params.adx > 25) {
|
||||
score += 15
|
||||
reasons.push(`Strong trend (ADX ${params.adx.toFixed(1)})`)
|
||||
} else if (params.adx < 18) {
|
||||
score -= 15
|
||||
reasons.push(`Weak trend (ADX ${params.adx.toFixed(1)})`)
|
||||
if (isShortTimeframe) {
|
||||
// 5min/15min thresholds
|
||||
if (params.adx > 22) {
|
||||
score += 15
|
||||
reasons.push(`Strong trend for ${params.timeframe}min (ADX ${params.adx.toFixed(1)})`)
|
||||
} else if (params.adx < 12) {
|
||||
score -= 15
|
||||
reasons.push(`Weak trend for ${params.timeframe}min (ADX ${params.adx.toFixed(1)})`)
|
||||
} else {
|
||||
score += 5
|
||||
reasons.push(`Moderate trend for ${params.timeframe}min (ADX ${params.adx.toFixed(1)})`)
|
||||
}
|
||||
} else {
|
||||
score += 5
|
||||
reasons.push(`Moderate trend (ADX ${params.adx.toFixed(1)})`)
|
||||
// Higher timeframe thresholds (1H, 4H, D)
|
||||
if (params.adx > 25) {
|
||||
score += 15
|
||||
reasons.push(`Strong trend (ADX ${params.adx.toFixed(1)})`)
|
||||
} else if (params.adx < 18) {
|
||||
score -= 15
|
||||
reasons.push(`Weak trend (ADX ${params.adx.toFixed(1)})`)
|
||||
} else {
|
||||
score += 5
|
||||
reasons.push(`Moderate trend (ADX ${params.adx.toFixed(1)})`)
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user